
Originally Posted by
Lighttouch
A few facts first . . .
Only 4% of disabled people are wheelchair users
The reason why there are designated accessible parking bays is to allow a disabled person to open the doors wider to allow free entry or exit while using crutches or foldable wheelchair. That's why there's cross hatching areas either side of the bay.
thats fine if you are a wheelchair user there should of course be more space, bays should be marked for that use alone, i agree why should i be allowed to park in a wheelchair space when i don't use one, as my parkinsons progresses then ill probably need one and i look forward to the parking in whatever guise it takes being available.
Generally the accessible bays are situated closer to a venue entrance for convenience and it's a shorter distance to walk.
my complaint and points are not to do with the provision of "disabled" parking they are to do with how it is provided of course i understand the need and in my previous posts i clearly state that
The actual wheelchair symbol is a 'pictogram' that serves to instantly tell people it's a reserved space for a disabled person - it's a universal language.
this is a universal language? well it doesn't describe me or the 96% of non-wheel chair users (your data) e.g. how about the OAP road sign showing 2 older people hunched over sticks that described some old people but not all and was therefore offensive and that is why it is not used, the wheelchair symbol is also no longer used on architectural drawings disabled routes and toilets etc are simply "accessible"
The terminology 'disabled person' embraces all spectrums of impairments from physical, mental, sensory and hearing loss.
Tax disc - Joe Public doesn't go looking at tax disc data - they aren't interested! It aids Traffic Wardens. Should you ever leave your car in an 'unofficial ' parking spot in error. The police or traffic warden will look at the tax disc. If it says 'disabled' by law they cannot wheelclamp or tow your car away to am impound. Or if they do in error, you'll get a refund or let off.
are you seriously suggesting that identifying my property is acceptable that the DVLA cannot use a different system and that traffic enforcement cannot scan your plate or disc to identify your vehicle, my medical information is no buisness of anyone else whether they are interested or not
Be more angry with the people who abuse the system by borrowing grannies blue badge or able bodied people using these bays because they are near the ATM machine.
again a revision of the system should mean that able-bodied are fined/discouraged etc, are you suggesting vigilantism? as per my previous posts it not my responsibility to enforce the scheme and i would imagine with a more complete and advanced scheme which meant borrowing a badge wouldn't work would presumably cut down on abuse, the very fact that someone can borrow a badge should demonstrate the utter ridiculousness of the system all you have to do is chuck a badge in you windscreen and you can park for free!! its as if the state has made it so simplistic that it creates jobs and administration to enforce it, its laughable.
And remember if people don't like the fact that you're disabled that's their problem not yours - and tell them that!